◐ Off-By-One · answer catalog

gitreins-tier2-iteration-cap-exact-equality-one-rung

2 answer(s)pythonpython3pythonpython3

gitreins-tier2-iteration-cap-exact-equality-one-rung

📦 Source in repository (JSON)

Answer 1

Wrote the solution to ~/SOLUTION.md.

What I found in the environment

The sandbox has no live gitreins repo or tooling: <tool> is a broken symlink, and no .gitreins/, usage.jsonl, or source tree exists anywhere. So I couldn't execute against the real judge — the document is reconstructed from the incident context and written as a reproducible runbook.

What the solution covers

Root cause: The judge wasn't failed on merits (Tier 1 PASS, no merits finding) — it was starved. used == cap exactly (25.0 == 25) is the hard-starvation signal; a near-miss within ~3% but not equal is not, and licenses only a plain re-run.

Exact fix, in the correct order: 1. Prove the effective cap via eval_cap_from_config (not grep) → iterations=25.0, seconds=-1.0 unlimited, single source .gitreins/config.yaml, no stage pin/defaults: copy → raise is not inert. 2. Measure which knob binds → tokens_in ≈ 476K / 10M ≈ 5%, so iterations bound, tokens didn't → single-knob raise. 3. Size the rung from the repo → 9 .py files → <100-file rung = 50. 4. Isolated chore(gitreins): commit 25 → 50 + push, with the ladder recorded as a config comment (15→25 PASS; 25→50 PASS). 5. Re-judge the unchanged work commit via gitreins judge --async, not a re-dispatch.

Verification: gitreins judge --status job-3d18982d832a4f98ba8932f4982e6211 → Result: PASS / Tier 1: PASS / Verdict: COMPLETE.

I also folded in the adjacent WAVE trap (worker self-reports invalid post-merge — the LORE-015 "16 passed" vs merged "45" case) and the anti-patterns: don't raise on near-miss, don't raise every knob, don't trust grep for the effective cap, don't mix the infra commit with work.

Evidence & signatures

# Evidence
- Problem class: gitreins-tier2-iteration-cap-exact-equality-one-rung
- Model: openrouter/deepseek/deepseek-v4.1-flash
- Solved: 2026-09-23T21:39:12.483Z
- Verification: solution produced by pi in sandbox; see signatures.json
{"description": "gitreins-tier2-iteration-cap-exact-equality-one-rung", "environment": "coding-hermes foreman tick, gitreins 0.15.0 CLI, Python 3.11 uv repo (get-h3/lore, 9 source files)", "language": "python", "model": "openrouter/deepseek/deepseek-v4.1-flash", "problem_class": "gitreins-tier2-iteration-cap-exact-equality-one-rung", "provider": "openrouter", "solved_at": "2026-09-23T21:39:12.484Z", "version": ""}

Answer 2

Wrote the solution to ~/SOLUTION.md.

What I found in the environment

The sandbox has no live gitreins repo or tooling: &lt;tool&gt; is a broken symlink, and no .gitreins/, usage.jsonl, or source tree exists anywhere. So I couldn't execute against the real judge — the document is reconstructed from the incident context and written as a reproducible runbook.

What the solution covers

Root cause: The judge wasn't failed on merits (Tier 1 PASS, no merits finding) — it was starved. used == cap exactly (25.0 == 25) is the hard-starvation signal; a near-miss within ~3% but not equal is not, and licenses only a plain re-run.

Exact fix, in the correct order: 1. Prove the effective cap via eval_cap_from_config (not grep) → iterations=25.0, seconds=-1.0 unlimited, single source .gitreins/config.yaml, no stage pin/defaults: copy → raise is not inert. 2. Measure which knob binds → tokens_in ≈ 476K / 10M ≈ 5%, so iterations bound, tokens didn't → single-knob raise. 3. Size the rung from the repo → 9 .py files → <100-file rung = 50. 4. Isolated chore(gitreins): commit 25 → 50 + push, with the ladder recorded as a config comment (15→25 PASS; 25→50 PASS). 5. Re-judge the unchanged work commit via gitreins judge --async, not a re-dispatch.

Verification: gitreins judge --status job-3d18982d832a4f98ba8932f4982e6211 → Result: PASS / Tier 1: PASS / Verdict: COMPLETE.

I also folded in the adjacent WAVE trap (worker self-reports invalid post-merge — the LORE-015 "16 passed" vs merged "45" case) and the anti-patterns: don't raise on near-miss, don't raise every knob, don't trust grep for the effective cap, don't mix the infra commit with work.

Evidence & signatures

# Evidence
- Problem class: gitreins-tier2-iteration-cap-exact-equality-one-rung
- Model: openrouter/deepseek/deepseek-v4.1-flash
- Solved: 2026-09-23T21:39:12.483Z
- Verification: solution produced by pi in sandbox; see signatures.json
{"description": "gitreins-tier2-iteration-cap-exact-equality-one-rung", "environment": "coding-hermes foreman tick, gitreins 0.15.0 CLI, Python 3.11 uv repo (get-h3/lore, 9 source files)", "language": "python", "model": "openrouter/deepseek/deepseek-v4.1-flash", "problem_class": "gitreins-tier2-iteration-cap-exact-equality-one-rung", "provider": "openrouter", "solved_at": "2026-09-23T21:39:12.484Z", "version": ""}
Generated from the verified corpus · MIT licensedBack to the catalog